Sorry Folks... It's been a long day. I'm not up to the task tonight. I'll post this weekend. Thanks for all your patience.
Friday, January 30, 2004
Wednesday, January 28, 2004
Tuesday, January 27, 2004
Tuesday Tid-Bits
Thanks to Jilly for her link to this Annie Sexton piece.
This is how you rewrite history: White House emissaries head abroad to recast war
Carl Sandburg Remembered (note - the writer and I are not one-in-the-same or related)
Katey have some cool fin links lister. Check them out.
This is how you rewrite history: White House emissaries head abroad to recast war
Carl Sandburg Remembered (note - the writer and I are not one-in-the-same or related)
Katey have some cool fin links lister. Check them out.
Monday, January 26, 2004
Subliminals
You say... I think:
Always fun to do these and see what others responses are.
squawking hawq
one good bumblebee
- Political:: Party
- Concentration:: Camp
- Fish:: Blue Gill
- Lunacy:: Mind
- Red:: Blood
- Imply:: Accuse
- Recognize:: See
- Sexist:: Pig
- Commercial:: Shop
- Stricken:: Sea
Always fun to do these and see what others responses are.
squawking hawq
one good bumblebee
Saturday, January 24, 2004
Top Five Explanation
James is frustrated... "But I'm also a tad frustrated, because I don't know what I did this week that made the space better than it was last week."
Let me shed a little light on my selection process.
First, I read a good number of blogs each week. Many are not poetry related. There are some great ones, but they have to touch on the core subject of poetry and poetics to be able to count in my Top Five list.
Next, I like to see some poetry itself. It isn't a mandate, but poetry or poetic discussions put forward by the bloggers themselves are helpful at gaining my attention.
I would like to see balance. If I wanted to focus on a strictly serious academic blog of poetics, Ron Silliman (hypothetically of course) would win each week. I like a balance of humor, other items the blogger has found interesting and linked to, quotations that expand the mind and to a lesser degree, the aesthetic appearance of the blog. The latter I usually only go to if I am having to decide between two blogs that are otherwise scoring a tie with me for that week.
As for James, or anyone else that feels like the won one week with a weaker (or about the same) blog that say they had the previous week... they must understand that some weeks the overall competition is tougher than others.
Yes, James the weekly top five is labor intensive on my part. I have a number of projects that I am working on besides my own poetry. The major one being a book about the San Francisco Giants home for forty years, Candlestick Park. I am reaching a point where this project (to stay on deadline) may cause me to rethink the Weekly Top-Five List.
Posting the results are not the biggest time consumption part of the process. Reading and notating or scoring the blogs themselves is the biggest consumption of time involved. I do feel I benefit from the exposure to the blogs so it is a positive experience. It is also in this context that I feel the Top-Five List provides others who have worked hard on their posts with some acknowledgement and kudos.
My site meter suggests that each week we have new readers. If I can point a few people to other interesting blogs that they may not have seen before, then everyone involved gains.
I hope this gives some clarity to my process of selection.
Let me shed a little light on my selection process.
First, I read a good number of blogs each week. Many are not poetry related. There are some great ones, but they have to touch on the core subject of poetry and poetics to be able to count in my Top Five list.
Next, I like to see some poetry itself. It isn't a mandate, but poetry or poetic discussions put forward by the bloggers themselves are helpful at gaining my attention.
I would like to see balance. If I wanted to focus on a strictly serious academic blog of poetics, Ron Silliman (hypothetically of course) would win each week. I like a balance of humor, other items the blogger has found interesting and linked to, quotations that expand the mind and to a lesser degree, the aesthetic appearance of the blog. The latter I usually only go to if I am having to decide between two blogs that are otherwise scoring a tie with me for that week.
As for James, or anyone else that feels like the won one week with a weaker (or about the same) blog that say they had the previous week... they must understand that some weeks the overall competition is tougher than others.
Yes, James the weekly top five is labor intensive on my part. I have a number of projects that I am working on besides my own poetry. The major one being a book about the San Francisco Giants home for forty years, Candlestick Park. I am reaching a point where this project (to stay on deadline) may cause me to rethink the Weekly Top-Five List.
Posting the results are not the biggest time consumption part of the process. Reading and notating or scoring the blogs themselves is the biggest consumption of time involved. I do feel I benefit from the exposure to the blogs so it is a positive experience. It is also in this context that I feel the Top-Five List provides others who have worked hard on their posts with some acknowledgement and kudos.
My site meter suggests that each week we have new readers. If I can point a few people to other interesting blogs that they may not have seen before, then everyone involved gains.
I hope this gives some clarity to my process of selection.
Friday, January 23, 2004
Stick Poet Top Five Blog List for the Week
It's that time again. These are the five most impressive poetry blogs I've read this week.
No. 5 Craig Hill's Poetry Scorecard (repeating at No. 5 from last week)
No. 4 The Chatelaine's Poetics (repeating at No. 4 from last week)
No. 3 Love During Wartime (previous winner back on the list again)
No. 2 One Good Bumblebee / previously known as Chewing On Pencils (No. 1 on the list for five weeks in a row)
No. 1 Poetry Hut Blog (moving up from No. 2 last week)
Congratulation to all... I enjoyed this weeks reads.
No. 5 Craig Hill's Poetry Scorecard (repeating at No. 5 from last week)
No. 4 The Chatelaine's Poetics (repeating at No. 4 from last week)
No. 3 Love During Wartime (previous winner back on the list again)
No. 2 One Good Bumblebee / previously known as Chewing On Pencils (No. 1 on the list for five weeks in a row)
No. 1 Poetry Hut Blog (moving up from No. 2 last week)
Congratulation to all... I enjoyed this weeks reads.
Thursday, January 22, 2004
Beyond Decent Poets
Katey(One Good Bumblebee / formerly Chewing on Pencils) reports on her disagreement with a fellow poet in AIM over the significance of the meaning of a poem. The argument is not a new one but I have to say that I believe the real issue is not the importance of the meaning but rather how important is it that the meaning of the writer and the perception of the reader be one in the same.
First of all, none of us share the same life experiences. Because of that, our exposure to concepts and even reality is limited to our own personal sphere of influence. What we have seen, read, felt, smelled, experienced in any of a number of ways. Most of us are not going to look at any three words paired together and necessarily come to the same point.
I believe both Katey and I for example have posted the subliminals on our blogs. We likely don't often match the same words. Much in this same way, we may read the same poem and find vastly different meaning. After all, of all literary forms poetry is the most compact usage of language and therefore the most introspective.
Katey's AIM friend suggests that this will not happen if the poet is a decent poet. May I politely suggest that this is a pile horse crap! By this fellow's standards, a lot of poets just fell from grace. My assessment is that poetry is for the most part a collaborative between the writer and the reader. As a writer my own feeling is that as soon as I put something out there in the public view, be becomes subject to collaborative views of the readers.
What the hell is a"decent" poet anyway? One fully clothed?
First of all, none of us share the same life experiences. Because of that, our exposure to concepts and even reality is limited to our own personal sphere of influence. What we have seen, read, felt, smelled, experienced in any of a number of ways. Most of us are not going to look at any three words paired together and necessarily come to the same point.
I believe both Katey and I for example have posted the subliminals on our blogs. We likely don't often match the same words. Much in this same way, we may read the same poem and find vastly different meaning. After all, of all literary forms poetry is the most compact usage of language and therefore the most introspective.
Katey's AIM friend suggests that this will not happen if the poet is a decent poet. May I politely suggest that this is a pile horse crap! By this fellow's standards, a lot of poets just fell from grace. My assessment is that poetry is for the most part a collaborative between the writer and the reader. As a writer my own feeling is that as soon as I put something out there in the public view, be becomes subject to collaborative views of the readers.
What the hell is a"decent" poet anyway? One fully clothed?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)